Categories
Close
Menu
Menu
Close
Search
Search

Featured Articles

RSS
123

Opinion Articles

Opinion

Freezing Android Phones just won't break the ice with forensic investigators

Mark

Share:

Print

Rate article:

No rating
Rate this article:
No rating

Yuval Ben-Moshe writes:

Freezing Android phones just won't break the ice with forensic investigators.

Leading and available mobile forensics tools already have similar capabilities, enabling law enforcement to effectively obtain admissible evidences from mobile devices.

Mobile forensics has evolved at an exponential rate over the last decade or so. The rise of the Smartphone has meant it’s had to. Forensic investigations can rely on taking fingerprints or finding DNA samples on a car seat, as well as data from digital devices, such as mobile phones.

With the correct software, operated by a trained investigator, mobile data can be extracted and analysed very quickly. It’s vital that this process isn’t a lengthy one, as investigators can sometimes be operating in life or death situations.

A single device that has both the capability to extract as well as analyse mobile data is far more efficient and accurate than freezing the phone first and then processing the data in a separate computer.

The data that’s stored on a user’s mobile phone such as sent messages, browsed websites and recent calls can help investigators build a fairly accurate picture of a case. Devices such as the UFED device from Cellebrite, can not only retrieve this data but can also salvage data that’s been deleted by the user.

This can be critical to an investigation. Criminals could be mistaken for thinking that by deleting sensitive data they are removing it from the reach of the investigator.

Although digital technology has made criminal coordination easier, it has also made criminals more vulnerable to being caught. Before the age of the mobile phone, criminals would communicate via a landline telephone and, before that, through a telegram or a written letter. These methods of communication could be easily erased to avoid discovery.

Research into data extraction and analysis methods for the latest technology is of vital importance to law enforcement agencies. But, people should be aware of the technology that’s out there and at the disposal of investigators.

People should also be aware that due to the critical nature of digital forensics, taking a ‘DIY approach’ to data extraction is not the way forward. Investigators must use technology such as the UFED device for accuracy’s sake, in addition to the fact that it saves a considerable amount of time.

Yuval Ben-Moshe is senior forensics technical director at Cellebrite. Last year we spoke to Dave Golding of Cellebrite about the company’s smartphone fault diagnosis tool; you can hear the interview via our website audio player or by downloading the mp3 file.

Comments

Collapse Expand Comments (0)
You don't have permission to post comments.

Recent Podcasts

ExclusiveSmartphone shipments, multiple messages and a Best Buy buy-out

This week's news report begins with quarterly figures from Samsung and Apple - and a discussion about what the future may hold for iOS.

We also talk about instant messaging versus SMS, the end of Best Buy's European joint venture with Carphone Warehouse, patent wars, white spaces and connected cars.

ExclusiveHanging on the Telephone

It feels like many people are hanging on to mobile advertising as the future of mobile marketing.

Yet there's much more to mobile marketing than the banner ad. In this podcast a panel of experts considers the latest trends and innovation that could change the future of marketing.

ExclusiveVisiting the GSMA Connected City at Mobile World Congress 2013

In this special feature we're looking around the GSMA Connected City at Mobile World Congress 2013.

Mark Bridge and Grant Notman discuss machine-to-machine communications and the Internet of Things, meeting people who've worked with 4G-enabled cars, port logistics, connected houses, m-health and the GSMA's own app development programme.

ExclusiveBring Your Own Device: A Faustian Pact? (part 2)

This is the second part of our programme recorded at the April 2013 meeting of Mobile Monday London, where a panel of experts discussed the topic 'BYOD: A Faustian Pact?'

The panel was chaired by David Rogers of Copper Horse Solutions. His panellists were Caroline Maloney from Telefonica, Charles Brookson of Azenby, David Arnold from BlackBerry and Gemma Coles from Mubaloo.

RSS
First1819202123252627Last

Follow thefonecast.com

Archive Calendar

«May 2026»
MonTueWedThuFriSatSun
27282930123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
1234567

Archive