Categories
Close
Menu
Menu
Close
Search
Search

Featured Articles

RSS
123

Opinion Articles

Opinion

Web Browser vs. Application Stores

Mark

Share:

Print

Rate article:

No rating
Rate this article:
No rating

James Rosewell writes:

Anyone involved in the mobile industry will have hardly failed to notice the hype surrounding mobile application stores - led by Apple. Application stores provide a really simple way for consumers to install applications on their mobile phones. They’re so simple I heard Iain Graham had used one the other week.

However they don’t solve the fundamental problem of handset compatibility. Anyone wishing to develop a native application for mobile phones needs to consider the handsets they wish to target and in which order. There’s Apple, Web OS, Nokia S40/S60, Windows, Android to name but five. For years, providers of consumer applications have only needed to worry about Microsoft and Apple with many choosing to ignore Apple. Unless today's application creator has deep pockets and makes many versions they’ll need to make some tough choices about where to start.

Could the Web Browser provide a solution?  Unlike native applications that execute on the mobile handset, web browsers are dumb and do what they’re told by a more sophisticated web server. Increasingly they offer standard support for technologies that provide a richer user experience such as Javascript and Flash. Developers are already familiar with the technologies involved and don’t need to learn entirely new interfaces and standards so can become productive more quickly.

However the big drawback of web browsers is their insistence in having a constant connection to the internet, something that is not always possible in the vague world of mobile data connections.

Solving this problem represents an opportunity for mobile browser manufacturers. Allowing their web browser to operate partially independent of the internet would allow application creators to build their solutions confident they’ll work on many handsets. This approach won’t work for all application types, those that need to control the handset or use specific features of a phone, but will help many that provide discrete services such as games, social networking and content. Google have made some big advances in this area with their Google Gears and now Wave technology.

In summary, before reaching for an Apple iPhone Developer to create your latest application, consider the alternatives. There’s no harm in creating a “lowest common denominator” for the web browser to quickly and cheaply get started before expanding to other platforms once you know which handsets are actually being used.

Comments

Collapse Expand Comments (0)
You don't have permission to post comments.

Recent Podcasts

ExclusiveSmartphone shipments, multiple messages and a Best Buy buy-out

This week's news report begins with quarterly figures from Samsung and Apple - and a discussion about what the future may hold for iOS.

We also talk about instant messaging versus SMS, the end of Best Buy's European joint venture with Carphone Warehouse, patent wars, white spaces and connected cars.

ExclusiveHanging on the Telephone

It feels like many people are hanging on to mobile advertising as the future of mobile marketing.

Yet there's much more to mobile marketing than the banner ad. In this podcast a panel of experts considers the latest trends and innovation that could change the future of marketing.

ExclusiveVisiting the GSMA Connected City at Mobile World Congress 2013

In this special feature we're looking around the GSMA Connected City at Mobile World Congress 2013.

Mark Bridge and Grant Notman discuss machine-to-machine communications and the Internet of Things, meeting people who've worked with 4G-enabled cars, port logistics, connected houses, m-health and the GSMA's own app development programme.

ExclusiveBring Your Own Device: A Faustian Pact? (part 2)

This is the second part of our programme recorded at the April 2013 meeting of Mobile Monday London, where a panel of experts discussed the topic 'BYOD: A Faustian Pact?'

The panel was chaired by David Rogers of Copper Horse Solutions. His panellists were Caroline Maloney from Telefonica, Charles Brookson of Azenby, David Arnold from BlackBerry and Gemma Coles from Mubaloo.

RSS
First1819202123252627Last

Follow thefonecast.com

Archive Calendar

«May 2026»
MonTueWedThuFriSatSun
27282930123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
1234567

Archive