Categories
Close
Menu
Menu
Close
Search
Search

Featured Articles

RSS
123

Opinion Articles

Opinion

The mobile communications of World War One

Mark

Share:

Print

Rate article:

No rating
Rate this article:
No rating

Mark Bridge writes:

Unmanned drone aircraft are flown by pilots thousands of miles away, while hackers attempt to intercept their transmissions. Temporary WiFi connections offer internet access to soldiers working at army bases in unfamiliar countries, prompting warnings about sharing too much information on social networks. Civilians transmit live video coverage of military activity from their mobile phones, putting themselves at risk of being targeted.

It’s clear that communications technology has transformed 21st century warfare.

What may not be so obvious are the ways that wireless communications played a part in the First World War... and the concerns about security that remain with us today.

Radio had proved its worth at sea before the war when the RMS Titanic hit an iceberg in 1912. The stricken liner sent a Morse Code radio distress call that was received by RMS Carpathia. As a result, more than 700 people were rescued from the Atlantic Ocean. During WW1, all the major navies used radio equipment - and were also aware of the risks involved with wireless technology. Communications could be overheard and could even be located by the enemy. As a result, ships tended to avoid sending messages unless it was essential. Instead, radio was used mainly for receiving one-way messages. Submarines had a greater problem: they could only communicate when they were on or very near the surface, risking discovery.

And there was another issue that affected everyone using wireless during the 1914-1918 conflict. Most equipment at the beginning of the war wasn’t capable of sending voice by radio, which meant Morse or military codes needed to be ‘tapped out’ by hand and translated by radio operators.

The danger of intercepted messages wasn’t just restricted to the sea. Direction-finding receivers were also used on battlefields, causing land-based forces to be cautious as well. While messages to and from the frontline were sometimes delivered by motorcyclist dispatch riders, it wasn’t unusual to see carrier pigeons and messenger dogs being employed. Similarly, semaphore flags and lights were utilised when field telephone lines weren’t practical. But this didn’t prevent radio equipment from being carried into battle by horse-drawn vehicles or trucks on occasions.

Radio equipment was bulky, which is one of the reasons it wasn’t used much in aircraft at the start of the Great War. Antennas were long and batteries were heavy. Yet by the end of the war, wireless communications had evolved dramatically. In 1918, several hundred RAF aircraft had been fitted with two-way radios that could transmit voices, enabling an informal version of Air Traffic Control. Transmissions were used in a different way by the pilots of German Zeppelin airships; they listened to radio signals in order to track their own location as they flew towards England.

Wireless technology was in its infancy at the time of the First World War. However, the benefits and the risks were already clear to military commanders. Although the technology has developed in the past 100 years, many of those risks and benefits remain largely unchanged. It’s still a challenge to ensure your message is heard by the right people... and not overheard by the wrong ones.

Mark Bridge is a freelance copywriter who’s easily distracted by any kind of vintage wireless technology. He’s also one of the team behind The Fonecast, which produces podcasts about the UK mobile phone industry every week.

Comments

Collapse Expand Comments (0)
You don't have permission to post comments.

Recent Podcasts

ExclusiveMotorola cuts jobs, Digia acquires Qt and Starbucks partners with Square

This week's edition of The Fonecast starts with news that Motorola Mobility is to lose around a fifth of its staff worldwide. There's also more reorganisation at Nokia, which is passing its Qt software business to Digia.

In addition we're talking about a new US partnership between Starbucks and Square, some good news for Research In Motion, a worrying report for Samsung and a major milestone for Shazam.

ExclusiveSamsung and Apple's quarterly results, smartphone sales figures and much more

There are plenty of quarterly results to report in this week's edition of The Fonecast, including Samsung, Apple, Telefonica and Facebook. In addition, we have new research that shows how smartphone sales are racing ahead as feature phone sales slow down.

There's also news about mobile coverage in the Channel Tunnel, mobile application downloads and m-commerce.

ExclusiveDoug Suriano of Tekelec talks about net neutrality for mobile networks

In today's podcast we're talking to Doug Suriano, Chief Technology Officer at mobile broadband solutions company Tekelec, about net neutrality.

Net neutrality is the principle that consumers are not restricted in the ways they're able to use their internet connection. The topic is often in the headlines, either because some governments may want to prevent their citizens from viewing certain types of information - or because of commercial restrictions.

ExclusiveOfcom prepares the UK for 4G, WAC joins the GSMA and O2 talks about compensation

We start this week's podcast with two news stories from Ofcom. Not only has the regulator announced its plans for the UK's 4G spectrum auction, it's also released research that shows we're texting more than we talk.

There's a look at the changing relationship between HTC and Beats Electronics, O2's apology for the network outage earlier this month and the Wholesale Applications Community's integration into the GSMA.

RSS
First2930313234363738Last

Follow thefonecast.com

Archive Calendar

«May 2026»
MonTueWedThuFriSatSun
27282930123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
1234567

Archive